| Abstracts 2001 |
Department
of Economics
|
|
|
|
||
No.
01-1 R. Glen Donaldson, Mark Kamstra
"Volatility
Forecasts, Trading Volume and the ARCH vs. Option-Implied Volatility Tradeoff"
Market expectations of future return volatility
play a crucial role in finance; so too does our understanding of the process
by which information is incorporated in security prices through the trading
process. This paper seeks to learn something about both of these
issues by investigating empirically the role of trading volume (a) in predicting
the relative informativeness of volatility forecasts produced by ARCH models
versus the volatility forecasts derived from option prices, and (b) in
improving volatility forecasts produced by ARCH and option models and combinations
of models. We find that if trading volume was low during period t-1
then ARCH is much more important than options for forecasting future stock
market volatility. Conversely, if volume was high during period t-1,
then option-implied volatility is much more important than ARCH for forecasting
future volatility. Our findings reveal an important regime-switching
role for trading volume states. Results from various tests also uncover
possible sources of volume-related nonlinearity in the relationship between
past and future return innovations as captured by asymmetric ARCH models.
Download Paper
(Read Only)
No.
01-2 Abdala Mansour, Nicolas Marceau, Steeve Mongrain
" Gangs and
Crime Deterrence"
A framework is developed in which the formation
of gang - the criminal market structure - is andogenous. We examine
the impact of crime deterrence in this framework. It is shown that
for a given gang structure, an increase in deterrence reduces criminal
output. However, under identifiable circumstances, an increase in
deterrence can also lead to an increase in the number of competing criminal
gangs and to an increase in total illegal output.
Download Paper
No.
01-3 J. Atsu Amegashie, Joe Amoaka-Tuffour
"Price Bargaining
and Quantity Bonus in Developing Economies"
The paper models
a trading practice, prevalent in markets of agricultural produce in developing
countries, where there is price bargaining and the buyer also receives
extra units of the commodity for free after both parties have agreed on
the price. We call these extra units quantity bonus. We model
quantity bonus as a profit tax on the seller and show that the practice
increases the bargained price. We endogenize the quantity bonus and
argue that it is used by sellers as a competitive device; quantity bonus
is then a self-sustaining social norm. Although price can replicate
the use of quantity bonus as a competitive tool, we argue that the price
bargaining limits the extent to which price can be used as a competitive
tool. The analysis sheds light on why market women allow for price
bargaining and opportunity for quantity bonus while supermarkets offer
neither of both.
Download
Paper
No.
01-4 Toru Kikuchi, J. Atsu Amegahie
"Trade Liberalization
and Union Bargaining"
The present note builds a two-country model
of oligopoly with country-specific labour unions. The impact of trade
liberalization on wages and its consequent impact on union bargaining and
trade patterns are examined. We show that the union with relatively
lower number of firms will face the stronger pressure for wage moderation
when trade is liberalized. We use this result to construct a simple
example in which a country with high autarky price becomes net exporter
of that good.
Download Paper